Quality Win-Loss Matrix
The Quality Win-Loss Matrix ranks teams solely on three factors: (1) Who did you play? (2) Where did you play them? and (3) Did you win or lose?
Year: 2009 | 2008 |
Week: Pre-season | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
Quality Win-Loss Matrix- Week 2![]() Biggest wins this season |
||||
| # | Team | Rating | Win Points | Loss Points |
| 1 | East Carolina (2-0) | 23.09 | 23.09 | 0 |
| 2 | Alabama (2-0) | 13.89 | 13.89 | 0 |
| 3 | UCLA (1-0) | 11.17 | 11.17 | 0 |
| 4 | Utah (2-0) | 9.41 | 9.41 | 0 |
| 5 | Kentucky (2-0) | 9.06 | 9.06 | 0 |
| 6 | Vanderbilt (2-0) | 7.27 | 7.27 | 0 |
| 7 | Georgia Tech (2-0) | 7.03 | 7.03 | 0 |
| 8 | Missouri (2-0) | 6.39 | 6.39 | 0 |
| 9 | Florida (2-0) | 5.94 | 5.94 | 0 |
| 10 | Fresno St. (1-0) | 5.92 | 5.92 | 0 |
| 11 | California (2-0) | 5.77 | 5.77 | 0 |
| 12 | Arkansas St. (2-0) | 4.62 | 4.62 | 0 |
| 13 | Texas Tech (2-0) | 3.02 | 3.02 | 0 |
| 14 | Southern Cal (1-0) | 2.73 | 2.73 | 0 |
| 15 | Oregon (2-0) | 2.33 | 2.32 | 0 |
| 16 | BYU (2-0) | 1.83 | 1.83 | 0 |
| 17 | Oklahoma (2-0) | 1.73 | 1.72 | 0 |
| 18 | TCU (2-0) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0 |
| 19 | Oklahoma St. (2-0) | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0 |
| 20 | Penn St. (2-0) | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0 |
| 21 | South Florida (2-0) | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0 |
| 22 | Air Force (2-0) | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0 |
| 23 | Wisconsin (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | Colorado (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | Iowa St. (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | Kansas St. (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | Kansas (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | Nebraska (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | Northwestern (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | Texas (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | Connecticut (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | Ohio St. (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | Rice (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | Tulsa (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | Notre Dame (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | Ball St. (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | Purdue (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | Minnesota (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | Arizona St. (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | Arizona (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | Iowa (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | Florida St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | Indiana (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | Georgia (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 45 | Wake Forest (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | Arkansas (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 47 | Auburn (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | LSU (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 49 | Troy (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50 | Boise St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 51 | North Carolina (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 52 | New Mexico St. (0-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 54 | Hawaii (1-1) | -1 | 0 | 1 |
| 55 | Miami (1-1) | -1.51 | 0 | 1.51 |
| 56 | Cincinnati (1-1) | -3.87 | 0 | 3.87 |
| 57 | Virginia (1-1) | -4.62 | 0 | 4.62 |
| 58 | Stanford (1-1) | -5.68 | 4.18 | 9.87 |
| 59 | Cent. Michigan (1-1) | -6.17 | 0 | 6.17 |
| 60 | Fla. Atlantic (1-1) | -7.94 | 0 | 7.94 |
| 61 | Illinois (1-1) | -8.34 | 0 | 8.34 |
| 62 | Southern Miss. (1-1) | -8.83 | 0 | 8.83 |
| 63 | UCF (1-1) | -8.92 | 0 | 8.92 |
| 64 | Tulane (0-1) | -9.08 | 0 | 9.08 |
| 65 | Nevada (1-1) | -9.37 | 0 | 9.37 |
| 66 | Michigan St. (1-1) | -10.05 | 0 | 10.05 |
| 67 | San Jose St. (1-1) | -10.12 | 0 | 10.12 |
| 68 | Akron (1-1) | -10.13 | 0 | 10.13 |
| 69 | Houston (1-1) | -10.41 | 0 | 10.41 |
| 70 | Toledo (0-1) | -10.46 | 0 | 10.46 |
| 71 | UNLV (1-1) | -10.67 | 0 | 10.67 |
| 72 | Clemson (1-1) | -11.19 | 0 | 11.19 |
| 73 | Marshall (1-1) | -11.25 | 0 | 11.25 |
| 74 | Louisiana Tech (1-1) | -11.41 | 0 | 11.4 |
| 75 | N.C. State (1-1) | -11.92 | 0 | 11.92 |
| 76 | W. Michigan (1-1) | -12.26 | 0 | 12.26 |
| 77 | E. Michigan (1-1) | -12.45 | 0 | 12.45 |
| 78 | Idaho (1-1) | -12.45 | 0 | 12.45 |
| 79 | Michigan (1-1) | -12.83 | 0 | 12.83 |
| 80 | Louisville (1-1) | -13 | 0 | 13 |
| 81 | Colorado St. (1-1) | -13.32 | 0 | 13.32 |
| 82 | Mississippi (1-1) | -13.39 | 0 | 13.39 |
| 83 | West Virginia (1-1) | -13.49 | 0 | 13.49 |
| 84 | Middle Tenn. St. (1-1) | -13.51 | 3.87 | 17.38 |
| 85 | Tennessee (0-1) | -14.05 | 0 | 14.05 |
| 86 | Rutgers (0-1) | -14.77 | 0 | 14.77 |
| 87 | Virginia Tech (1-1) | -14.92 | 0 | 14.93 |
| 88 | Baylor (1-1) | -15.09 | 0 | 15.09 |
| 89 | Buffalo (1-1) | -15.21 | 0 | 15.21 |
| 90 | Boston College (1-1) | -15.72 | 0 | 15.72 |
| 91 | Temple (1-1) | -15.93 | 0 | 15.93 |
| 92 | Bowling Green (1-1) | -16.11 | 4.31 | 20.42 |
| 93 | Navy (1-1) | -16.85 | 0 | 16.85 |
| 94 | South Carolina (1-1) | -17.2 | 0 | 17.2 |
| 95 | Wyoming (1-1) | -17.23 | 0 | 17.23 |
| 96 | Duke (1-1) | -17.35 | 0 | 17.35 |
| 97 | La.-Lafayette (0-1) | -17.98 | 0 | 17.97 |
| 98 | Washington (0-2) | -19.23 | 0 | 19.23 |
| 99 | Maryland (1-1) | -20.39 | 0 | 20.39 |
| 100 | Pittsburgh (1-1) | -20.53 | 0 | 20.53 |
| 101 | Mississippi St (1-1) | -21.55 | 0 | 21.55 |
| 102 | La.-Monroe (0-2) | -21.95 | 0 | 21.95 |
| 103 | Washington St. (0-2) | -22.37 | 0 | 22.37 |
| 104 | SMU (1-1) | -22.55 | 0 | 22.55 |
| 105 | Texas A&M (1-1) | -22.77 | 0 | 22.77 |
| 106 | Oregon St. (0-2) | -23.59 | 0 | 23.59 |
| 107 | Ohio (0-2) | -23.71 | 0 | 23.7 |
| 108 | Florida Intl (0-2) | -26.71 | 0 | 26.7 |
| 109 | Utah St. (0-2) | -26.74 | 0 | 26.74 |
| 110 | New Mexico (0-2) | -28.38 | 0 | 28.38 |
| 111 | North Texas (0-2) | -28.79 | 0 | 28.79 |
| 112 | UTEP (0-2) | -30.67 | 0 | 30.67 |
| 113 | Kent St. (0-2) | -32.37 | 0 | 32.37 |
| 114 | Miami (Ohio) (0-2) | -32.69 | 0 | 32.69 |
| 115 | San Diego St. (0-2) | -35.05 | 0 | 35.05 |
| 116 | UAB (0-2) | -35.76 | 0 | 35.76 |
| 117 | Memphis (0-2) | -38.37 | 0 | 38.37 |
| 118 | N. Illinois (0-2) | -38.41 | 0 | 38.41 |
| 119 | Syracuse (0-2) | -39.41 | 0 | 38.41 |
Computing the Quality Win-Loss Matrix
The Quality Win-Loss Matrix assigns win points and loss points to every game of the season based on the strength of the opponent’s VSI and where the game was played.
Defeat a team with a VSI of 8 and receive ~8 win points. Defeat a team with a VSI of 21 and receive ~21 win points.
If you defeat a below average team, one with a negative VSI, you do not receive any win points - after all what have you really accomplished by beating a below average team?
Loss points are calculated in reverse. The lower the VSI of your opponent, the higher the loss points a team accumulates so teams are penalized more for losing to bad teams.
Win points and loss points are combined to create a single ranking for apples-to-apples comparisons across teams playing widely different strengths of schedule.
2010 College Basketball Atomic Sports Rankings
Check out the latest college basketball rankings from Fan Formula. More »
Vegas Spread Index
Estimates who the odds makers would favor from top to bottom. More »
Quality Win-Loss Matrix
Ranks teams solely on three factors: (1) Who did you play? (2) Where did you play them? and (3) Did you win or lose? More »
True Style Points
Quantifies performance based on margin of victory. More »
Road Warrior Rankings
Calculates the biggest victories in opponents’ home stadiums. More »
Top 25 Heat Index
Identifies and highlights the teams playing the best right now. More »
Undefeated SoS
Ranks the undefeated teams based on strength of schedule. More »
Atomic Home
All six rankings. Home »
2009
- Experiencing Technical Difficulties
- Undefeated but Only Half as Dominant?
- Where's the Love for the Longhorns?
- Alabama Confirms It
- Thirteen Teams in Fourteen Days
- Texas Separates From the Speed States
- Sunshine State Domination
- How Long Can BYU Remain on Top?
- Dispute at the Top
- Movers and Losers
2008
2009
- Bowl Week
- Championshp Week
- Week 13 picks - Texas Showdown
- Week 12 picks - Tiger by the Tail
- Week 11 picks - Wildcats & Thundercats
- Week 10 picks - Low Tide
- Week 9 picks - Straight Up Saturday
- Week 8 picks - Straight Outta Crompton
- Week 7 picks - Texas Showdown
- Week 6 picks - Road Trip, Road Trip, Road Trip
- Week 5 picks - SEC Rolls - Mountaineers Struggle
- Week 4 picks - Forget the Preseason Rankings
- Week 3 picks - The Bearcat is Back
- Week 2 picks - Return of the Buckasaurus
- Week 1 picks - Baby's Got 'Pack
- Rated for 2009
2008
- Bowl Week
- Week 14 - Time to Step Up
- Week 13 - Lame Ducks, and Beavers
- Week 12 - No Longer Playing Like Freshmen
- Week 11 - Enemy of My Enemy
- Week 10 - SEC Dominance
- Week 9 - Winning on the Road
- Week 8 - Big Names - Little O's
- Week 7 - Buy the Bye
- Week 6 - What Do We Have to Do to Win Big?
- Week 5 - It’s Another Underdog Saturday