Quality Win-Loss Matrix
The Quality Win-Loss Matrix ranks teams solely on three factors: (1) Who did you play? (2) Where did you play them? and (3) Did you win or lose?
Year: 2009 | 2008 |
Week: Pre-season | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
Quality Win-Loss Matrix- Week 3![]() Biggest wins this season |
||||
| # | Team | Rating | Win Points | Loss Points |
| 1 | Miami (2-0) | 19.05 | 19.05 | 0 |
| 2 | Houston (2-0) | 18.93 | 18.93 | 0 |
| 3 | Cincinnati (3-0) | 16.23 | 16.23 | 0 |
| 4 | Michigan (3-0) | 14.17 | 14.17 | 0 |
| 5 | BYU (2-1) | 11.55 | 27.64 | 16.1 |
| 6 | Missouri (3-0) | 11.53 | 11.53 | 0 |
| 7 | Washington (2-1) | 11.04 | 18.57 | 7.53 |
| 8 | Alabama (3-0) | 10.71 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 9 | Texas (3-0) | 10.51 | 10.51 | 0 |
| 10 | Georgia (2-1) | 9.95 | 16.3 | 6.35 |
| 11 | UCLA (3-0) | 9.77 | 9.77 | 0 |
| 12 | Boise St. (3-0) | 8.43 | 8.43 | 0 |
| 13 | Iowa (3-0) | 5.25 | 5.25 | 0 |
| 14 | Florida (3-0) | 5.13 | 5.13 | 0 |
| 15 | Colorado St. (3-0) | 3.76 | 3.76 | 0 |
| 16 | Auburn (3-0) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 17 | Virginia Tech (2-1) | 2.18 | 9.15 | 6.97 |
| 18 | California (3-0) | 1.66 | 1.66 | 0 |
| 19 | Florida St. (2-1) | 1.16 | 13.54 | 12.38 |
| 20 | LSU (3-0) | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0 |
| 21 | North Carolina (3-0) | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0 |
| 22 | TCU (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | Texas A&M (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | Mississippi (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | Southern Miss. (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | Kansas (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | Kentucky (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | South Florida (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | Pittsburgh (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | Arizona St. (2-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | Indiana (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | Penn St. (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | Wisconsin (3-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 35 | Cent. Michigan (2-1) | -1.15 | 9.86 | 11.02 |
| 36 | Oklahoma St. (2-1) | -3.23 | 13.28 | 16.51 |
| 37 | South Carolina (2-1) | -3.87 | 7.38 | 11.25 |
| 38 | Texas Tech (2-1) | -4.01 | 0 | 4.01 |
| 39 | Notre Dame (2-1) | -4.68 | 7.56 | 12.24 |
| 40 | Southern Cal (2-1) | -5.53 | 13.5 | 19.03 |
| 41 | Tulsa (2-1) | -6 | 0 | 6 |
| 42 | Oklahoma (2-1) | -6.38 | 6.82 | 13.21 |
| 43 | Connecticut (2-1) | -6.87 | 8.18 | 15.05 |
| 44 | Ohio St. (2-1) | -7.38 | 0 | 7.38 |
| 45 | Georgia Tech (2-1) | -7.43 | 5.59 | 13.02 |
| 46 | Oregon (2-1) | -7.66 | 3.22 | 10.89 |
| 47 | Clemson (2-1) | -9.05 | 3.33 | 12.38 |
| 48 | N. Illinois (2-1) | -9.18 | 2.89 | 12.06 |
| 49 | Mississippi St (2-1) | -10.36 | 2.74 | 13.1 |
| 50 | La.-Lafayette (2-1) | -10.59 | 0 | 10.59 |
| 51 | Minnesota (2-1) | -10.83 | 0 | 10.84 |
| 52 | Arkansas St. (1-1) | -11.01 | 0 | 11.01 |
| 53 | Nebraska (2-1) | -11.19 | 0 | 11.19 |
| 54 | Oregon St. (2-1) | -11.75 | 1.89 | 13.64 |
| 55 | Middle Tenn. St. (2-1) | -11.98 | 0 | 11.98 |
| 56 | Marshall (2-1) | -12.78 | 0 | 12.78 |
| 57 | Baylor (1-1) | -13.15 | 6.58 | 19.73 |
| 58 | West Virginia (2-1) | -13.17 | 0 | 13.17 |
| 59 | Illinois (1-1) | -13.3 | 0 | 13.31 |
| 60 | Boston College (2-1) | -13.35 | 0 | 13.35 |
| 61 | Wake Forest (2-1) | -13.41 | 0 | 13.41 |
| 62 | UNLV (2-1) | -13.48 | 0 | 13.48 |
| 63 | Arizona (2-1) | -13.74 | 0 | 13.74 |
| 64 | Rutgers (2-1) | -14.05 | 0 | 14.05 |
| 65 | N.C. State (2-1) | -14.09 | 0 | 14.09 |
| 66 | Arkansas (1-1) | -14.59 | 0 | 14.59 |
| 67 | Utah (2-1) | -14.75 | 0 | 14.75 |
| 68 | Louisville (1-1) | -15.2 | 0 | 15.2 |
| 69 | UCF (2-1) | -16.16 | 0 | 16.16 |
| 70 | Iowa St. (2-1) | -16.24 | 0 | 16.23 |
| 71 | Stanford (2-1) | -16.46 | 0 | 16.46 |
| 72 | Air Force (2-1) | -17.6 | 0 | 17.6 |
| 73 | Ohio (2-1) | -17.77 | 0 | 17.77 |
| 74 | Troy (1-2) | -17.92 | 0 | 17.92 |
| 75 | La.-Monroe (1-2) | -18.46 | 0 | 18.46 |
| 76 | Idaho (2-1) | -19.1 | 0 | 19.1 |
| 77 | Tennessee (1-2) | -19.34 | 0 | 19.34 |
| 78 | Hawaii (2-1) | -19.49 | 0 | 19.49 |
| 79 | Army (2-1) | -21.37 | 0 | 21.37 |
| 80 | Northwestern (2-1) | -21.43 | 0 | 21.43 |
| 81 | Navy (1-2) | -22.27 | 0 | 22.27 |
| 82 | Fla. Atlantic (0-2) | -22.89 | 0 | 22.89 |
| 83 | Florida Intl (0-2) | -25.46 | 0 | 25.46 |
| 84 | Toledo (1-2) | -26.3 | 0 | 26.3 |
| 85 | Wyoming (1-2) | -26.75 | 0 | 26.75 |
| 86 | Syracuse (1-2) | -26.97 | 0 | 26.97 |
| 87 | SMU (2-1) | -27.29 | 0 | 27.29 |
| 88 | Utah St. (0-2) | -27.5 | 0 | 27.5 |
| 89 | Nevada (0-2) | -27.77 | 0 | 27.77 |
| 90 | Fresno St. (1-2) | -28.56 | 0 | 28.56 |
| 91 | Louisiana Tech (1-2) | -29.08 | 0 | 29.08 |
| 92 | Bowling Green (1-2) | -29.6 | 4.22 | 33.82 |
| 93 | East Carolina (1-2) | -29.78 | 0 | 29.78 |
| 94 | Maryland (1-2) | -30.52 | 0 | 30.52 |
| 95 | Michigan St. (1-2) | -30.74 | 0 | 30.75 |
| 96 | Memphis (1-2) | -31.35 | 0 | 31.35 |
| 97 | Vanderbilt (1-2) | -31.74 | 0 | 31.74 |
| 98 | Akron (1-2) | -31.75 | 0 | 31.75 |
| 99 | Tulane (0-2) | -32.13 | 0 | 32.13 |
| 100 | W. Michigan (1-2) | -32.94 | 0 | 32.94 |
| 101 | North Texas (1-2) | -33.11 | 0 | 33.11 |
| 102 | Temple (0-2) | -34.57 | 0 | 34.57 |
| 103 | Purdue (1-2) | -35.7 | 0 | 35.7 |
| 104 | Duke (1-2) | -35.99 | 0 | 35.99 |
| 105 | UTEP (1-2) | -36 | 0 | 36 |
| 106 | Rice (0-3) | -36.4 | 0 | 36.4 |
| 107 | Kent St. (1-2) | -37.05 | 0 | 37.05 |
| 108 | Kansas St. (1-2) | -37.27 | 0 | 37.27 |
| 109 | San Jose St. (0-3) | -39.27 | 0 | 39.27 |
| 110 | Buffalo (1-2) | -39.59 | 0 | 39.59 |
| 111 | Colorado (1-2) | -40.36 | 0 | 40.36 |
| 112 | Washington St. (1-2) | -42.5 | 0 | 42.5 |
| 113 | San Diego St. (1-2) | -43.49 | 0 | 43.49 |
| 114 | UAB (1-2) | -44.86 | 0 | 44.86 |
| 115 | New Mexico (0-3) | -48 | 0 | 47.99 |
| 116 | Miami (Ohio) (0-3) | -49.42 | 0 | 49.42 |
| 117 | W. Ky (0-3) | -52.01 | 0 | 52.01 |
| 118 | E. Michigan (0-3) | -52.27 | 0 | 52.27 |
| 119 | Virginia (0-3) | -52.65 | 0 | 52.65 |
| 120 | New Mexico St. (1-2) | -53.17 | 0 | 52.65 |
Computing the Quality Win-Loss Matrix
The Quality Win-Loss Matrix assigns win points and loss points to every game of the season based on the strength of the opponent’s VSI and where the game was played.
Defeat a team with a VSI of 8 and receive ~8 win points. Defeat a team with a VSI of 21 and receive ~21 win points.
If you defeat a below average team, one with a negative VSI, you do not receive any win points - after all what have you really accomplished by beating a below average team?
Loss points are calculated in reverse. The lower the VSI of your opponent, the higher the loss points a team accumulates so teams are penalized more for losing to bad teams.
Win points and loss points are combined to create a single ranking for apples-to-apples comparisons across teams playing widely different strengths of schedule.
2010 College Basketball Atomic Sports Rankings
Check out the latest college basketball rankings from Fan Formula. More »
Vegas Spread Index
Estimates who the odds makers would favor from top to bottom. More »
Quality Win-Loss Matrix
Ranks teams solely on three factors: (1) Who did you play? (2) Where did you play them? and (3) Did you win or lose? More »
True Style Points
Quantifies performance based on margin of victory. More »
Road Warrior Rankings
Calculates the biggest victories in opponents’ home stadiums. More »
Top 25 Heat Index
Identifies and highlights the teams playing the best right now. More »
Undefeated SoS
Ranks the undefeated teams based on strength of schedule. More »
Atomic Home
All six rankings. Home »
2009
- Experiencing Technical Difficulties
- Undefeated but Only Half as Dominant?
- Where's the Love for the Longhorns?
- Alabama Confirms It
- Thirteen Teams in Fourteen Days
- Texas Separates From the Speed States
- Sunshine State Domination
- How Long Can BYU Remain on Top?
- Dispute at the Top
- Movers and Losers
2008
2009
- Bowl Week
- Championshp Week
- Week 13 picks - Texas Showdown
- Week 12 picks - Tiger by the Tail
- Week 11 picks - Wildcats & Thundercats
- Week 10 picks - Low Tide
- Week 9 picks - Straight Up Saturday
- Week 8 picks - Straight Outta Crompton
- Week 7 picks - Texas Showdown
- Week 6 picks - Road Trip, Road Trip, Road Trip
- Week 5 picks - SEC Rolls - Mountaineers Struggle
- Week 4 picks - Forget the Preseason Rankings
- Week 3 picks - The Bearcat is Back
- Week 2 picks - Return of the Buckasaurus
- Week 1 picks - Baby's Got 'Pack
- Rated for 2009
2008
- Bowl Week
- Week 14 - Time to Step Up
- Week 13 - Lame Ducks, and Beavers
- Week 12 - No Longer Playing Like Freshmen
- Week 11 - Enemy of My Enemy
- Week 10 - SEC Dominance
- Week 9 - Winning on the Road
- Week 8 - Big Names - Little O's
- Week 7 - Buy the Bye
- Week 6 - What Do We Have to Do to Win Big?
- Week 5 - It’s Another Underdog Saturday