Quality Win-Loss Matrix
The Quality Win-Loss Matrix ranks teams solely on three factors: (1) Who did you play? (2) Where did you play them? and (3) Did you win or lose?
Year: 2009 | 2008 |
Week: Pre-season | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
Quality Win-Loss Matrix- Week 1![]() Biggest wins this season |
||||
| # | Team | Rating | Win Points | Loss Points |
| 1 | BYU (1-0) | 27.64 | 27.64 | 0 |
| 2 | Oklahoma St. (1-0) | 13.29 | 13.28 | 0 |
| 3 | Miami (1-0) | 12.06 | 12.06 | 0 |
| 4 | Missouri (1-0) | 11.53 | 11.53 | 0 |
| 5 | Alabama (1-0) | 10.71 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 6 | Cincinnati (1-0) | 7.88 | 7.88 | 0 |
| 7 | South Carolina (1-0) | 7.38 | 7.38 | 0 |
| 8 | Baylor (1-0) | 6.58 | 6.58 | 0 |
| 9 | Boise St. (1-0) | 5.95 | 5.95 | 0 |
| 10 | Bowling Green (1-0) | 4.22 | 4.22 | 0 |
| 11 | Colorado St. (1-0) | 3.63 | 3.63 | 0 |
| 12 | Notre Dame (1-0) | 2.03 | 2.02 | 0 |
| 13 | East Carolina (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | Tulsa (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | West Virginia (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | Texas (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | Kansas (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | Kansas St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | Texas A&M (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | Iowa St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | Minnesota (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | Nebraska (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | Idaho (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | Mississippi (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | Marshall (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | UCF (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | Southern Miss. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | Tennessee (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | UAB (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | Houston (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | Wyoming (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | Vanderbilt (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | Arkansas (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | Auburn (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | LSU (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | Mississippi St (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | North Carolina (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | SMU (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | Army (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | Florida (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | Kentucky (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | Florida Intl (0-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | South Florida (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | La.-Lafayette (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 45 | North Texas (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | Arkansas St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 47 | UCLA (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | Pittsburgh (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 49 | Buffalo (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50 | Louisville (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 51 | Connecticut (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 52 | Air Force (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 53 | TCU (0-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 54 | Georgia Tech (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 55 | Hawaii (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 56 | UNLV (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 57 | Fresno St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 58 | Arizona St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 59 | Texas Tech (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 60 | Utah (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 | Stanford (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 62 | California (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | Arizona (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 64 | Oregon St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 65 | Southern Cal (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | Boston College (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 67 | Clemson (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 68 | Northwestern (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 69 | Purdue (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 70 | Michigan St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 71 | Indiana (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 72 | Penn St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 73 | Iowa (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 74 | Wisconsin (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 75 | Michigan (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 76 | Ohio St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 77 | Kent St. (1-0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 79 | La.-Monroe (0-1) | -2.9 | 0 | 2.9 |
| 80 | San Jose St. (0-1) | -5.42 | 0 | 5.42 |
| 81 | Georgia (0-1) | -6.34 | 0 | 6.35 |
| 82 | Maryland (0-1) | -6.92 | 0 | 6.92 |
| 83 | Virginia Tech (0-1) | -6.97 | 0 | 6.97 |
| 84 | Navy (0-1) | -7.11 | 0 | 7.11 |
| 85 | Nevada (0-1) | -7.48 | 0 | 7.48 |
| 86 | Akron (0-1) | -7.5 | 0 | 7.5 |
| 87 | Washington (0-1) | -7.53 | 0 | 7.53 |
| 88 | Fla. Atlantic (0-1) | -8.76 | 0 | 8.76 |
| 89 | Memphis (0-1) | -8.99 | 0 | 8.99 |
| 90 | Oregon (0-1) | -10.89 | 0 | 10.89 |
| 91 | Cent. Michigan (0-1) | -11.02 | 0 | 11.02 |
| 92 | W. Michigan (0-1) | -11.25 | 0 | 11.25 |
| 93 | Louisiana Tech (0-1) | -11.58 | 0 | 11.58 |
| 94 | W. Ky (0-1) | -11.84 | 0 | 11.84 |
| 95 | Middle Tenn. St. (0-1) | -11.99 | 0 | 11.98 |
| 96 | N. Illinois (0-1) | -12.07 | 0 | 12.06 |
| 97 | Utah St. (0-1) | -12.3 | 0 | 12.3 |
| 98 | Florida St. (0-1) | -12.37 | 0 | 12.38 |
| 99 | New Mexico (0-1) | -13.1 | 0 | 13.1 |
| 100 | Oklahoma (0-1) | -13.21 | 0 | 13.21 |
| 101 | Illinois (0-1) | -13.3 | 0 | 13.31 |
| 102 | Wake Forest (0-1) | -13.41 | 0 | 13.41 |
| 103 | Rutgers (0-1) | -14.05 | 0 | 14.05 |
| 104 | N.C. State (0-1) | -14.09 | 0 | 14.09 |
| 105 | Toledo (0-1) | -14.83 | 0 | 14.83 |
| 106 | San Diego St. (0-1) | -14.9 | 0 | 14.9 |
| 107 | Miami (Ohio) (0-1) | -15.97 | 0 | 15.97 |
| 108 | Tulane (0-1) | -16.29 | 0 | 16.29 |
| 109 | Rice (0-1) | -16.59 | 0 | 16.59 |
| 110 | Troy (0-1) | -16.92 | 0 | 16.92 |
| 111 | Syracuse (0-1) | -17.06 | 0 | 17.06 |
| 112 | Ohio (0-1) | -17.77 | 0 | 17.77 |
| 113 | Washington St. (0-1) | -17.92 | 0 | 17.92 |
| 114 | Colorado (0-1) | -19.63 | 0 | 19.63 |
| 115 | UTEP (0-1) | -21.93 | 0 | 21.93 |
| 116 | E. Michigan (0-1) | -23.34 | 0 | 23.34 |
| 117 | Temple (0-1) | -25 | 0 | 25 |
| 118 | Virginia (0-1) | -25 | 0 | 25 |
| 119 | Duke (0-1) | -25 | 0 | 25 |
| 120 | Ball St. (0-1) | -26.75 | 0 | 25 |
Computing the Quality Win-Loss Matrix
The Quality Win-Loss Matrix assigns win points and loss points to every game of the season based on the strength of the opponent’s VSI and where the game was played.
Defeat a team with a VSI of 8 and receive ~8 win points. Defeat a team with a VSI of 21 and receive ~21 win points.
If you defeat a below average team, one with a negative VSI, you do not receive any win points - after all what have you really accomplished by beating a below average team?
Loss points are calculated in reverse. The lower the VSI of your opponent, the higher the loss points a team accumulates so teams are penalized more for losing to bad teams.
Win points and loss points are combined to create a single ranking for apples-to-apples comparisons across teams playing widely different strengths of schedule.
2010 College Basketball Atomic Sports Rankings
Check out the latest college basketball rankings from Fan Formula. More »
Vegas Spread Index
Estimates who the odds makers would favor from top to bottom. More »
Quality Win-Loss Matrix
Ranks teams solely on three factors: (1) Who did you play? (2) Where did you play them? and (3) Did you win or lose? More »
True Style Points
Quantifies performance based on margin of victory. More »
Road Warrior Rankings
Calculates the biggest victories in opponents’ home stadiums. More »
Top 25 Heat Index
Identifies and highlights the teams playing the best right now. More »
Undefeated SoS
Ranks the undefeated teams based on strength of schedule. More »
Atomic Home
All six rankings. Home »
2009
- Experiencing Technical Difficulties
- Undefeated but Only Half as Dominant?
- Where's the Love for the Longhorns?
- Alabama Confirms It
- Thirteen Teams in Fourteen Days
- Texas Separates From the Speed States
- Sunshine State Domination
- How Long Can BYU Remain on Top?
- Dispute at the Top
- Movers and Losers
2008
2009
- Bowl Week
- Championshp Week
- Week 13 picks - Texas Showdown
- Week 12 picks - Tiger by the Tail
- Week 11 picks - Wildcats & Thundercats
- Week 10 picks - Low Tide
- Week 9 picks - Straight Up Saturday
- Week 8 picks - Straight Outta Crompton
- Week 7 picks - Texas Showdown
- Week 6 picks - Road Trip, Road Trip, Road Trip
- Week 5 picks - SEC Rolls - Mountaineers Struggle
- Week 4 picks - Forget the Preseason Rankings
- Week 3 picks - The Bearcat is Back
- Week 2 picks - Return of the Buckasaurus
- Week 1 picks - Baby's Got 'Pack
- Rated for 2009
2008
- Bowl Week
- Week 14 - Time to Step Up
- Week 13 - Lame Ducks, and Beavers
- Week 12 - No Longer Playing Like Freshmen
- Week 11 - Enemy of My Enemy
- Week 10 - SEC Dominance
- Week 9 - Winning on the Road
- Week 8 - Big Names - Little O's
- Week 7 - Buy the Bye
- Week 6 - What Do We Have to Do to Win Big?
- Week 5 - It’s Another Underdog Saturday